The report was based on an analysis of some 300 studies over the past 18 months and indicated that these sexualized images can result in young girls viewing themselves as sex objects.
While they weren't the only toys singled out, the mention of Bratz dolls in this report got my attention. These dolls, popular with girls as young as 4, wear skimpy clothing, hang out in hot tubs and party with the "Boyz". With their pumped-up lips and heavy makeup, they look as if they belong in a brothel - not a little girl's toy chest.
Of course, Isaac Larian, CEO of Bratz doll manufacturer MGA entertainment disagrees with the report's judgment of the Bratz dolls. He says that girls across the USA are wearing the same type of clothing and that they are not sexy. Yes, girls everywhere are dressing like that. Which begs the question of which came first, the Bratz dolls or the sexed-up school girls?
Bratz dolls have been banned from our house since Ellie was old enough to want one. She thinks they are pretty. I think they are offensive. She has given up asking for one because she knows it isn't going to happen. Clearly lots of parents have no issue with these dolls; millions have been sold worldwide. I can't help but wonder why. With so many non-slutty dolls available, why would a parent allow Bratz in the house?